🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an celebration that started out as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels empowered to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to remove African American heritage and narrative from the archives is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month symbolises how little it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month completely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an foundation that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the threats that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.