🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.